New Delhi: A new controversy has arisen in the world of cricket after an English cricketer of Pakistani origin. great friend Criticized the great batting. Sunil Gavaskar For his comments on Indian-owned franchises signing Pakistani players in overseas leagues.Go beyond limits with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!After that, the debate broke out. Abrar Ahmed He was picked by Sunrisers Leeds for £190,000 at The Hundred auction, making him the first Pakistani cricketer to join an Indian-owned team in the competition. The move sparked a backlash among Indian fans, prompting Gavaskar to weigh in with a strong opinion.
Writing in his mid-day column, Gavaskar said that Indian-owned franchises should refrain from signing Pakistani players, arguing that such financial transactions could indirectly lead to a disadvantage against India. “The uproar … is hardly surprising,” he wrote, adding that the payments to athletes ultimately go to their governments through taxes, which can be used for military purposes. “If the owner is an Indian, he is contributing to Indian casualties. It’s as simple as that,” he also warned of possible fan protests and boycotts.However, Rafiq did not stop with his answer. Sharing Gavaskar’s comments on social media, he wrote: “This is absolutely ridiculous and should be condemned… How are these comments acceptable? I don’t care how many runs you score. His quick reaction quickly gained traction, adding another layer to the already heated debate.
Sunrisers Leeds head coach after Hundred auction Daniel Vettori Defending the signing, insisting that it was purely based on the needs of cricket. He revealed that the franchise turned to Abrar after the loss of England leg-spinner Adil Rashid, highlighting the Pakistani spinner’s versatility and effectiveness, especially in the powerplay.Meanwhile, Rajeev Shukla clarified that the BCCI has no jurisdiction over franchise decisions in foreign leagues, leaving the matter entirely to the team management.The episode has once again highlighted the complex intersection of sports, politics and public sentiment, with Rafique’s blunt criticism ensuring that Gavaskar’s remarks remain firmly in the spotlight.
