Car design is one of the most difficult matters in automobile manufacturing. Design is subjective and so what looks futuristic to one person may feel strange and mismatched to another. That said, the global auto industry has produced many cars that push the boundaries, sometimes a little too far. Some of these models also drew criticism for their unconventional looks. Here’s a closer look at some of the ugliest cars ever sold, including some of India’s most memorable names.
Pontiac Aztec
Image credit: Wikipedia
One of the most critically acclaimed designs globally is the Pontiac Aztek, launched in 2001. While crossover SUVs are now very common, that was not the case back then. The model became notorious for her messy style. The front looked uncluttered with split headlamps and a large grille, while the rear featured an odd, high-seat design. Its visual appeal never matched expectations, and it quickly became a sign of design gone wrong.
Fiat Multipla
Another global example is the Fiat Multipla, launched in 1998. Fiat took a bold approach with this MPV, giving it a two-tiered front design with exceptionally high headlamps. The result was a car that looked like it had an extra face sitting on top of the grill, almost like a frog. It had an unusually large windshield and very tall windows. Its design was widely mocked and remains one of the most polarizing in automotive history.
Nissan Cube
Japan also contributed to the list with the Nissan Cube, which debuted in 1998 and later entered global markets. The Cube had a boxy shape and an asymmetrical rear window design. Many found its styling too unorthodox, especially the one-sided back that looked unfinished.
Sang Yong Rodius
Image credit: Wikipedia
Next is the SsangYong Rodius, which was launched in 2004. Rodius aims to combine luxury and practicality. However, the execution fell short. The rear end looked asymmetric, almost as if it was taken from another vehicle. The overall silhouette lacks symmetry, making it one of the most criticized MPVs globally. Especially at the rear, it appears to be a full sedan with an unwanted upper deck.
Maruti Suzuki Omni.
Coming to India, the market has its share of oddly styled vehicles, often designed with utility first in mind. The Maruti Suzuki Omni, launched in 1984, is a prime example. The Omni was designed for functionality rather than aesthetics. Its boxy shape, flat panels and basic design make it functional but far from attractive. Nevertheless, it remained in production until 2019, proving that utility often outweighs design.
Chevrolet SRV
Image credit: OLX.
Another interesting case is the Chevrolet SRV, which was introduced in 2006. Based on the Opel Corsa platform, the SRV was meant to be a sporty hatchback. However, its dated design, awkward proportions and lack of visual balance meant it never really connected with buyers. Even at launch it looked out of place.
DC Thurs
India’s modding scene also gave us some controversial designs. DC Thar by DC Design is one such example. Dilip Chhabria’s firm was known for bold and sometimes impressive custom builds, but it missed the mark. The rugged and purposeful design of the original Mahindra Thar was replaced with flashy, over-stylized elements. The result was a vehicle that lost its identity and began to look exaggerated and unbalanced.
Mahindra’s UV100
Image credit: Wikipedia
Among Indian manufacturers, the Mahindra KUV100, launched in 2016, is also known for its unusual styling. Mahindra tried to create a new segment with this micro SUV, but the design was a mixed bag. The high seat bonnet, narrow stance, and oddly shaped headlamps made it look asymmetric. While it offered a unique layout with practical features and a front bench seat option, its styling remained the talking point.
ICML Rhino
Another lesser-known but notable entry is the ICML Rhino, launched in 2006 by International Cars and Motors Limited. Rhino had a distinct but ambiguous design language. The upper half was boxy and straight, while the lower half featured rounded elements. This similarity gave the SUV a disjointed look, and it struggled to find buyers in a competitive market.All said, “ugly” is always subjective. Some of these cars have developed a cult following over time, and others have been commercially successful despite their design flaws. Still, these models serve as a reminder that design can make or break a car’s image.
