The ongoing problems in the actors’ union, AMMA, have reached a tipping point with the actors Ansiba Hassan taking his case to court. In the Thrippunithura Magistrate’s Court against another actress, Lakshmipriya, and against a female Sub-Inspector of the Thrippunithura Women’s Police Station. This development comes against a backdrop of increasing conflict within the union, where disputes between members have become more public.
The actor seeks registration of FIR through court application
According to Mathrubhumi English report, in her petition, Ansiba approached the court to register an FIR against the said persons based on her complaint. Earlier, he had lodged similar complaints against Lakshmipriya, SI Reshma and Lakshmipriya’s husband before the Chief Minister and other concerned authorities. However, after an investigation, the police concluded that the complaint had insufficient grounds. Later, Ansiba filed another complaint with the police, but complained in court that no FIR had been registered. He also said that political influence prevented the police from taking action.
The court is seeking a police report on the matter
The Thrippunithura Magistrate Court has accepted the petition and directed the police to submit a report on the complaint. The court is expected to make a final decision after reviewing the report. The latest controversy comes at an important time when AMMA will hold a general meeting soon. The legal dispute adds more fuel to AMMA’s fire in terms of its functioning.
AMMA has to deal with internal rift before the general meeting
The controversy was sparked by Ansiba’s resignation from the position of joint secretary of AMMA. Ansiba has opposed the operation of the organization, and has accused some members of disturbing its image. One of his main accusations was against the actress little tomwho allegedly made defamatory comments. Actress Lakshmipriya, for her part, plans to file a defamation case against Ansiba for 10 million euros.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing reported by a third party source. The details given are allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case continues, and a final verdict has not been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
